Automotive Industry Challenges
The automotive pact, known as the Canada-U.S.
Agreement on Automotive Products or the Automobile Pact, signed in 1965, played a crucial role in integrating the Canadian and U.S.
automotive industries into a unified North American market.
While highly beneficial for Canada, the pact faced termination in 2001 due to perceived incompatibility with international trade rules.
By that time, its primary objective of North American industry unification with increased Canadian presence had been achieved.
 |
| Pacte de l’automobile entre le Canada et les États-Unis |
Industry in Distress
The automotive pact emerged as a compromise between Canada and the United States amid the Canadian government's efforts to address chronic trade and current account deficits in the early 1960s.
Establishing a more competitive automotive industry was deemed a key solution to overcome the economic challenges. In 1964, Canada's automotive trade deficit with the U.S.
reached nearly $600 million, highlighting the urgency for intervention.
Customs Duty Rebate System
Fearing a decline in the automotive sector, Prime Minister John Diefenbaker's government sought solutions.
Economist Vincent Bladen, commissioned to study the industry, rejected free trade and tariff increases, proposing instead a system to boost Canadian content by allowing duty-free imports of vehicles and parts, contingent on meeting Canadian content requirements.
In 1962, a 25% duty on automatic transmissions was maintained, coupled with a duty rebate system to encourage exports of Canadian-made automotive parts.
Negotiations Leading to the Automobile Pact
Following intense diplomatic negotiations in the summer and fall of 1964, both nations reached a compromise.
The resulting Automobile Pact was an administratively managed trade agreement, benefiting specific companies and featuring long-term safeguards to ensure Canadian industry growth.
While the U.S. aimed for a free trade agreement, Canada insisted on safeguards to prevent a significant decline in its automotive industry.
Signing at Lyndon B. Johnson's Ranch
Signed at Lyndon B. Johnson's ranch in Johnson City, Texas, on January 16, 1965, by President Johnson, Secretary of State Dean Rusk for the U.S., and Prime Minister Lester Pearson and Foreign Minister Paul Martin Sr.
for Canada, the pact aimed to create a larger market for automotive products.
To qualify, products had to include 50% Canadian and American content, applying to cars, trucks, buses, and original auto parts.
- Opposition in Both Countries
The agreement faced opposition in both countries but for different reasons.
In Canada, some believed it didn't do enough to establish a Canadian automotive industry, while in the U.S., critics argued it contradicted free-market principles.
Backlash in the U.S.
In 1965, the year the Automobile Pact took effect, Canada's automotive trade deficit with the U.S. rose to $785 million.
While the pact quickly increased Canada's share of North American automotive production, reaching 11.2% in 1971, it became a major irritant for the U.S.
The disagreement centered on whether Canadian safeguards should be temporary or permanent.
By 1971, facing its own balance of payments crisis, the U.S. nearly canceled the pact but ultimately refrained due to rapid intervention.
- Automotive Trade Boom
Despite disagreements, automotive trade between the two nations flourished.
By 1977, Canadian exports of vehicles and parts to the U.S. reached $9.9 billion, and imports from the U.S. grew to $10.9 billion.
Although the U.S. occasionally registered a surplus, the Canadian automotive industry became a major exporter, generating over 100,000 middle-class jobs by 1975.
Impact of Japanese Car Manufacturers
In the 1970s, the Japanese automotive industry entered North America.
By 1985, Japanese companies held a 16.4% share of the Canadian market.
Unable to join the Automobile Pact, Canada attracted Japanese investments by offering conditional duty rebates for exporting vehicles to the U.S. and elsewhere.
The U.S. aimed to eliminate these Canadian duty rebates during free trade negotiations in the 1980s.
- Free Trade and the End of the Automobile Pact
The 1989 Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Canada and the U.S. maintained the Automobile Pact's safeguards but required Canada to remove its duty rebate system.
Additionally, both countries agreed to eliminate duties on cross-border trade of new vehicles and parts for non-pact producers over a 10-year period starting in 1989.
With the establishment of the FTA and later the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Automobile Pact played a diminishing role in industry investments, though it remained a point of contention for European and Asian automakers.
Conclusion
- The Uruguay Round and Pact Termination
In 1994, Canada implemented Uruguay Round rules, leading to the cancellation of the Automobile Pact on February 19, 2001.
The termination, though scarcely noticed, marked the end of an era, shaping the automotive industry in North America for decades to come.
Q&A Section
- Q1: Why was the Automobile Pact terminated?
The termination of the Automobile Pact in 2001 was a result of perceived incompatibility with international trade rules, leading Canada to officially end the agreement.
- Q2: What were the key provisions of the Automobile Pact?
The Automobile Pact required products to have 50% Canadian and American content, applied to cars, trucks, buses, and original auto parts.
It featured long-term safeguards to ensure Canadian industry growth.
- Q3: How did the Japanese automotive industry impact the Automotive Pact?
Unable to join the pact, Japanese manufacturers invested in Canada, attracted by conditional duty rebates.
This led to concerns in the U.S. about Japanese companies building plants in Canada to serve the American market.